“This didn’t work for me.”
“I didn’t connect with the characters.”
“This needs a lot of revision.”
All of these, while painful, are at least somewhat useful. They have bones. They can be worked with.
But there is one response more haunting than all the rest.
“It’s okay.”
Not good. Not bad. Not even memorably terrible. Just…okay.
Literally the least useful piece of advice when it comes to writing. It's the literary equivalent of being handed a lukewarm cup of tea and told to feel something about it.
And just like that, the brain spirals because sometimes it likes to do that.
“Okay means average.”
“Average means forgettable.”
“Forgettable means I am, in fact, a fraud who has somehow tricked myself into writing an entire manuscript.”
The classic descent.
The Problem With “Okay”
“It’s okay” is not feedback. It’s a shrug in sentence form.
It doesn’t tell you:
- what worked
- what didn’t
- where the story dragged
- where it shone
It simply…exists. Vaguely. Unhelpfully. Like a ghost that refuses to elaborate.
And yet, we treat it like a verdict.
We hold it up like a judge’s ruling instead of what it actually is:
one person’s noncommittal reaction, likely filtered through their own inability to articulate what they experienced.
I went about and asked multiple people from all walks of life about their experiences and compiled them into this one entry.
Enter: Imposter Syndrome (Dressed for the Occasion)
Imposter syndrome loves a vague comment. It actually thrives on it.
It takes that “okay” and stretches it into something far more dramatic:
“You’re not good enough.”
“You’ve wasted your time.”
“Real writers don’t get responses like this.”
Which is fascinating, because real writers get every kind of response imaginable. Even Stephen King gets glowing praise, brutal critique, confusion, silence, and yes…the dreaded “it’s okay.”
The difference isn't in the response. The difference is in what they do next.
What to Do Instead of Dramatically Retiring to the Moors Today
Retire to the Moors tomorrow.
1. Ask better questions.
Do not ask, “What did you think?”
Ask:
- Where did you get bored?
- What parts stood out to you?
- Did any character feel unclear or flat?
- What lingered after you finished?
Vagueness invites vague answers. Specificity forces honesty.
Collect patterns, not opinions.
One reader saying “it’s okay” means very little.
Three readers pointing out the same pacing issue? Now we have something worth sharpening a knife over.
Read your own work like a stranger.
Step away from it. Then come back to it.
Where do you lose interest? Where do you skim? Where do you feel something shift?
Writers are often far better editors than they give themselves credit for
Define the fear properly.
“Not good enough” is too vague to fix.
Not good enough for what?
- Publication?
- Reader engagement?
- Your own (very high, very dramatic) standards?
Each of these has a different path forward.
A Slightly Uncomfortable Truth
Every manuscript is “okay” at some stage.
Some are okay before they become good.
Some are okay before they become great.
Some remain okay—and that’s still more than most people ever create.
Because finishing a manuscript at all?
That already puts you in a category many never reach.
The Quiet Reality
Imposter syndrome doesn’t show up because you’re incapable.
It shows up because you’ve made something real.
Something that can be read. Judged. Misunderstood. Loved. Ignored.
Something that exists outside of your control now.
And that is, unfortunately, the price of creating anything worth caring about.
So no, don’t crown “it’s okay” as the final word.
It hasn’t earned that kind of authority.
At best, it’s a starting point.
At worst, it’s background noise.
Either way you’re not done.
And that matters far more than “okay” ever will.
No comments:
Post a Comment